One of my interests is archaeology and the Dutch archaeologist whose blog this is an interesting one as well as good historian. I find his comments here very interesting. Personally, I do not believe the Bible needs scaffolding, but it is nice when a find confirms something in Scripture. Whether or not this stone does is debatable.
My Dutch blog has more readers than my English one. Perhaps it has, in Holland, even some influence. After I had written how Israeli archaeologists are angling for funds by presenting every find as confirming this Biblical story or contradicting that one, I was invited even by a Christian broadcasting organization to explain how this was damaging the study of ancient society.
Today, I received an interesting e-mail from an Israeli archaeologist who liked my point of view but wanted to show me that occasionally, archaeology does indeed confirm the story of the Bible. So, I now have a real scope: the discovery of the stone shown above.
Discovered in Cafarnaum, it looks like a normal stone, but it isn’t. It has been identified as the very object that is mentioned in the gospels of Matthew (8.20) and Luke (9.58): the place which the Son of…
View original post 8 more words